imc-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM IMC paper body versus its appendix and released artifact, covering the acmart page limits, the rule that decision-critical evidence and the Ethics discussion stay in the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, and how to split a measurement paper between body, appendix, and dataset.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# IMC Supplementary Use this when assembling IMC supplementary material. IMC's `acmart` format gives an **unlimited appendix**, which tempts authors to offload the argument — but the governing rule is strict: **the page-limited body must be self-contained and decision-complete.** Reviewers read the appendix and the artifact at their discretion; anything the decision depends on lives in the body. ## What goes where | Content | Body (within page limit) | Appendix / released artifact | |---|---|---| | The measurement question and the headline finding | Yes | — | | Vantage-point summary + coverage/representativeness argument | Yes | Full per-vantage-point table | | Methodology sufficient to judge soundness | Yes | Full configs, seed/target lists | | Key results, confidence intervals, and their limitations | Yes | Secondary plots, full result tables | | **The Ethics discussion** | **Yes (section; details may extend to appendix)** | IRB form, extended safety analysis | | Raw/large datasets, logs, scripts | — | Yes (released artifact) | | Reproduction instructions | A pointer | The README and run scripts | If a reviewer would need to open the appendix or artifact to know whether to accept
- What goes where
- The unlimited-appendix trap
- The Ethics section is not optional supplementary
- Double-blind supplementary rules
- Appendix architecture
- Vignette: splitting a multi-vantage-point study
- Output format
What does the imc-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM IMC paper body versus its appendix and released artifact, covering the acmart page limits, the rule that decision-critical evidence and the Ethics discussion stay in the reviewed pages, double-blind supplementary material, and how to split a measurement paper between body, appendix, and dataset.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imc-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.