ijcai-review-process
Use when explaining or planning around IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI two-phase review, summary rejection, PC/SPC/AC/SAC roles, author response visibility, reviewer confidentiality, conflict-of-interest policy, ethics checks, and decision dynamics.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijcai-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# IJCAI Review Process Use this to reason about review-stage strategy. Reopen the current CFP, FAQ, peer-review principles, and conflict policy before making process claims. ## Process model - Phase 1 can be decisive. IJCAI-ECAI 2026 gave every paper two PC reviews first; papers with two good-quality but insufficiently positive reviews could receive summary rejection without author response. - Papers advancing to full review receive additional review and discussion by PC/SPC members, with AC coordination and SAC cross-checking. - The response is concise and visible to the decision group specified by current rules; it is not a dialogue with reviewers. - Ethics concerns can be flagged by reviewers and escalated to the Ethics Chair. - Conflicts include recent coauthors, advisor/student relationships, same institution, current grants/projects, sponsorship, personal relationships, or animosity under the IJCAI COI policy. - Authors must not try to identify or contact reviewers, and reviewers must preserve submission confidentiality. ## Decision actors and where leverage lives | Stage | Who decides | Author leverage | Forbidden | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Phase 1 summary reject | Two PC
- Process model
- Decision actors and where leverage lives
- Worked vignette: surviving phase 1
- Reviewer pushback and the venue-specific fix
- Output format
What does the ijcai-review-process skill do?
Use when explaining or planning around IJCAI or IJCAI-ECAI two-phase review, summary rejection, PC/SPC/AC/SAC roles, author response visibility, reviewer confidentiality, conflict-of-interest policy, ethics checks, and decision dynamics.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ijcai-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.