Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

ier-literature-positioning

Use when staking an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript's contribution against the frontier and against sibling journals (Econometrica/QE, the top-5, field journals). Sharpens the gap and the delta; it does not invent citations.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ier-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: International-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/ier-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (ier-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The intro lists prior work but never says what *this* paper adds that none of them did - A coauthor cannot state, in one sentence, the delta over the single closest paper - The draft reads like a strong field-journal paper and you need the general-interest claim to be legible - You are unsure how to position against the obvious sibling (Econometrica/QE) so the desk editor sees why it is here, not there ## The IER positioning logic At IER the contribution is almost always **methodological or model-level generality**, so positioning is not "we study X in a new setting" — it is "the existing tool/result fails or is silent *here*, and ours is the first that is both correct and general." Build the position in three layers, from frontier down to the load-bearing delta: 1. **Frontier statement.** Name the 3–6 papers that define the current best answer. For a structural paper, name the canonical model you generalize or discipline; for a method paper, name the incumbent estimator; for theory, name the result you sharpen or overturn. 2. **The gap that matters.** State precisely what the frontier cannot do — a knife-ed

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The IER positioning logic
  3. Drawing the sibling boundaries (this is where IER papers get mis-filed)
  4. Worked example (illustrative)
  5. Common positioning failure and its fix
  6. Positioning by branch (the gap looks different in each)
  7. Checklist
  8. Positioning a theory result that "feels" already known
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Referee pushback mapped to the positioning fix
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ier-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when staking an International Economic Review (IER) manuscript's contribution against the frontier and against sibling journals (Econometrica/QE, the top-5, field journals). Sharpens the gap and the delta; it does not invent citations.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ier-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going