Agent skill · Security

ieeesp-related-work

Use when positioning an IEEE S&P (Oakland) paper against prior literature, including coverage across the four security flagships, concurrent-work and arXiv norms, the 40% resubmission-overlap disclosure, verifying venue attribution via dblp and IEEE Xplore, and anonymity-safe self-citation.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-related-work --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-related-work/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# IEEE S&P Related Work Use this when building the positioning sections. Security literature is scattered across four flagship conferences with staggered deadlines, so "prior work" at S&P means a moving window across venues — and the PC contains authors of the papers you are positioning against. ## The coverage lanes an Oakland reviewer checks | Lane | Where it lives | Typical miss | |---|---|---| | Same attack/defense family | S&P, USENIX Security, CCS, NDSS — last ~3 years of each | Citing only "your" flagship | | The system/protocol being attacked | Its home community (systems, networking, ML, crypto venues) | Attacking a strawman version already fixed upstream | | Prior SoKs of the area | S&P especially (SoK lane since 2010) | Re-taxonomizing without citing the existing taxonomy | | Defenses your attack bypasses / attacks your defense stops | Both academic and *deployed* (vendor advisories, OS release notes) | Ignoring deployed mitigations reviewers run daily | | Measurement baselines | PAM/IMC + the flagships | Claiming novelty for a re-measurement | The staggered-deadline effect: by any S&P cycle's close, the previous USENIX Security and CCS programs are public. Reviewers wil

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The coverage lanes an Oakland reviewer checks
  2. Positioning is a delta statement, not a list
  3. Concurrent work and arXiv
  4. The 40% rule creates a disclosure duty
  5. Verify venue attribution before citing
  6. Anonymous self-citation discipline
  7. Output format
Commands it runs
For each load-bearing citation:
curl -s "https://dblp.org/search/publ/api?q=<title>&format=json" | jq '.result.hits.hit[].info | {title, venue, year}'
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ieeesp-related-work skill do?

Use when positioning an IEEE S&P (Oakland) paper against prior literature, including coverage across the four security flagships, concurrent-work and arXiv norms, the 40% resubmission-overlap disclosure, verifying venue attribution via dblp and IEEE Xplore, and anonymity-safe self-citation.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going