Agent skill · AI & Agents

iclr-experiments

Use when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-experiments --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ICLR-Skills/skills/iclr-experiments/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ICLR Experiments Use this before submission or during a revision pass to stress-test empirical claims. ICLR experiments should answer the scientific question, not merely assemble a leaderboard. ## Experiment audit - Match each experiment to a claim in the introduction. - Compare against current strong baselines, open-source systems, and the most relevant recent OpenReview/arXiv papers. - Add ablations that isolate one mechanism at a time. - Report variance across seeds or runs when randomness can change conclusions. - Include robustness checks for dataset shift, prompt changes, architecture variants, hyperparameter sensitivity, or compute scale when those affect the claim. - State compute budget, hardware, training time, inference cost, and environmental or access limits where relevant. - For human evaluation, document task, annotator instructions, aggregation, quality control, and IRB or ethics status when needed. ## Reviewer questions to pre-answer - Is the baseline tuned fairly? - Does the method win because of more compute, data, parameters, or prompt search? - Does the effect persist outside the easiest benchmark? - Are negative results hidden? - Can a reviewer reproduce the

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Experiment audit
  2. Reviewer questions to pre-answer
  3. What ICLR reviewers reward in evidence
  4. Worked vignette
  5. Reviewer-pushback patterns
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the iclr-experiments skill do?

Use when designing or auditing ICLR experiments, including baselines, ablations, scaling laws, robustness, statistics, benchmarks, human evaluation, and compute reporting. Use when a reviewer questions whether a representation-learning or model gain is real, when you must isolate one mechanism with an ablation, or when preparing a small compute-matched control that can be posted inline during the public discussion period.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iclr-experiments --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going