Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

iccv-author-response

Use when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no attachments or links are allowed, addressing reviewers who are themselves deadline-crushed authors, and writing for the meta-review that follows.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-author-response/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ICCV Author Response In the 2025 cycle (verified 2026-07-08), reviews reached authors on May 9 and the rebuttal closed May 16: seven days to answer every reviewer in **one page**, using the rebuttal template from the official author kit. Decisions followed in late June with no further author input. This skill turns that week into a production schedule and the page into an argument budget. ## Constraints that define the genre - One page, official template, PDF. Over-length or reformatted responses are disregarded at CVF venues — squeezing margins is the same as writing nothing. - Anonymous, no external links, no attachments. A number you cannot state in a sentence or a tiny table does not exist for this rebuttal. - No new contributions. The rebuttal corrects errors, supplies requested clarifications, and reports small requested checks — it does not extend the paper. - The audience is layered: reviewers first, then the AC writing the meta-review during the discussion that runs after your window closes. Write sentences an AC can lift verbatim. ## The seven days, scheduled | Day | Work | Anti-pattern being prevented | |---|---|---| | 1 | Read everything once; no drafting; log each ob

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Constraints that define the genre
  2. The seven days, scheduled
  3. Choosing what fits the page
  4. Formatting the page for a skimming AC
  5. Tone rules with venue-specific reasons
  6. What the rebuttal cannot do
  7. Numbers etiquette inside the page
  8. Reverify each cycle
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the iccv-author-response skill do?

Use when ICCV reviews arrive and the one-page rebuttal must be drafted inside the one-week May window, covering the official template's constraints, evidence selection when no attachments or links are allowed, addressing reviewers who are themselves deadline-crushed authors, and writing for the meta-review that follows.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill iccv-author-response --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going