Agent skill · Documentation

icalp-reproducibility

Use when making an ICALP (EATCS) theory result independently checkable — writing complete, self-contained proofs in the appendix and a full version (arXiv/ECCC/HAL), pinning any computational steps to reproducible certificates, and (optionally) formalizing key theorems in Coq/Lean/Isabelle, since ICALP has no runnable-artifact track and proof verifiability is the analogue of reproducibility.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icalp-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ICALP-Skills/skills/icalp-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ICALP Reproducibility (proof verifiability and the full version) At a pure-theory venue, "reproducibility" means a referee — and later any reader — can **check the proof**. ICALP has **no artifact-evaluation track and no badges**; the deliverable that plays that role is the **full version** with complete proofs, plus, where relevant, reproducible computational certificates and optional machine formalization. This skill builds that checkability into the paper from the start, because a proof cannot be reconstructed after the fact any more than a lost dataset can. ## The full version is the reproducibility story - The 15-page body sketches; the **full version** (a clearly labelled appendix at submission, and an **arXiv/ECCC/HAL** posting at/after notification) contains **every proof in full**. This is what makes an ICALP result reproducible: an independent expert can verify it end to end. - Write proofs **self-contained**: state every lemma the argument uses, prove or cite each, and avoid "it is easy to see" for steps that are not. The test is whether a competent non-author can follow it without asking you. - Keep the **submission appendix and the eventual arXiv version consistent**

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The full version is the reproducibility story
  2. Self-contained proof checklist
  3. Reproducible computation, when a proof uses it
  4. Optional: machine-checked formalization
  5. What ICALP reproducibility is NOT
  6. Worked vignette: an intricate lower bound
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the icalp-reproducibility skill do?

Use when making an ICALP (EATCS) theory result independently checkable — writing complete, self-contained proofs in the appendix and a full version (arXiv/ECCC/HAL), pinning any computational steps to reproducible certificates, and (optionally) formalizing key theorems in Coq/Lean/Isabelle, since ICALP has no runnable-artifact track and proof verifiability is the analogue of reproducibility.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icalp-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going