Agent skill · Data & Analytics

humrel-methods

Use when choosing and justifying the research design for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — qualitative/ethnographic, critical, quantitative, or mixed — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see humrel-data-analysis).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Methods & Research Design (humrel-methods) ## When to trigger - You are choosing among a qualitative/ethnographic, critical, quantitative, or mixed-methods design - The design is chosen but its *rigor and transparency* are not yet defensible - A qualitative study lacks a sampling logic or trustworthiness safeguards - A quantitative study lacks construct validity or theorizes only the coefficient - A mixed-methods study cannot say *why* both strands and what each adds ## Principle: method follows the theoretical question — and HR privileges none HR treats qualitative, critical, quantitative, and mixed-methods work as **equally first-class**, in the Tavistock human-relations tradition. There is no house preference for an estimator or a paradigm; what is non-negotiable is that the design fits the social-theoretical question (from `humrel-theory-development`) and is executed with rigor, transparency, and reflexivity. A sophisticated method cannot rescue a thin theory, and a single immersive ethnography can carry an HR paper if the insight is deep and the craft is high. Note also the **double-anonymous review**: write methods so they establish credibility without revealing the authors

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Principle: method follows the theoretical question — and HR privileges none
  3. Branch A — Qualitative / ethnographic design
  4. Branch B — Critical design
  5. Branch C — Quantitative design
  6. Branch D — Mixed methods
  7. Either branch
  8. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  9. Checklist
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the humrel-methods skill do?

Use when choosing and justifying the research design for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — qualitative/ethnographic, critical, quantitative, or mixed — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see humrel-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going