hrm-review-process
Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response (hrm-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Understanding the Review Process (hrm-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to calibrate timeline and decision-type expectations - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it (R&R vs. reject; major vs. minor) - You want to know how much weight the action editor vs. reviewers carry - You are planning a revision strategy before drafting the response (then go to `hrm-rebuttal`) ## How HRM review works (durable norms; verify specifics on the official site) 1. **EIC fit-and-relevance screen.** The Editor-in-Chief decides whether a paper meets the journal's quality and relevance bar **before** it is sent out. A paper missing either half of the dual contribution — a scholarly advance *or* a practical implication — is desk-rejected here. This is the single biggest filter at HRM. 2. **Routing.** Papers that pass are assigned to an associate/action editor in the relevant domain (strategic HRM, micro/OB, employment relations, etc.). 3. **Double-blind peer review.** Typically several reviewers, who cannot see author identities, evaluate the contribution, the design rigor (multilevel structure, CMB, endogeneity, construct validity), and the practice payoff. Anonym
- When to trigger
- How HRM review works (durable norms; verify specifics on the official site)
- HRM is developmental and multi-round
- Reading the decision letter
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the hrm-review-process skill do?
Use when calibrating expectations for the Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") editorial process — the EIC fit/relevance screen, double-blind peer review, the developmental R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response (hrm-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.