hrm-rebuttal
Use when drafting the revision and response letter after a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across the journal's developmental, multi-round, double-blind process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (hrm-review-process).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-rebuttal --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# R&R Response & Rebuttal (hrm-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an HRM R&R and have planned the revision (via `hrm-review-process`) - You have made (or scoped) the manuscript changes and need to write the response document - You must reconcile conflicting reviewer demands for the action editor - A later-round decision asks you to defend or further revise prior changes > Write the response letter **after** revising the manuscript, not before — it documents changes made, not promises. HRM's process is developmental and typically multi-round; resubmit the revised (still-anonymized) manuscript and the response document through Wiley **ScholarOne**, keeping the same action editor across rounds where possible (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). ## Response-document structure 1. **Opening letter to the action editor.** Thank the editor and reviewers; summarize the most important changes in 2–4 sentences; explicitly state how you addressed the editor's stated priorities; note where reviewers conflicted and how you resolved it. 2. **Per-reviewer sections.** For each reviewer, restate every comment (verbatim or faithfully numbered), then respond. 3. **Point-by-point format** for each comment: -
- When to trigger
- Response-document structure
- Responding to HRM's signature demands
- Tone and tactics
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the hrm-rebuttal skill do?
Use when drafting the revision and response letter after a Human Resource Management (Wiley "HRM") revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across the journal's developmental, multi-round, double-blind process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (hrm-review-process).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hrm-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.