hri-supplementary
Use when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# HRI Supplementary Materials HRI is unusual among conferences in how much the **video** matters. The interaction it studies is temporal and embodied, and prose cannot convey what a robot's timing, motion, and presence do to a person. A well-made supplementary **video figure** materially changes how reviewers understand the contribution — and its absence is often read as a gap. This skill plans the video and the rest of the supplement, and splits content between the body and the supplement by decision-criticality. ## The video figure comes first Treat the video as a first-class artifact, not an afterthought: - **Show the interaction**, not just the robot: the person and robot together, the conditions being compared, and the behavior your contribution designs or studies. A reviewer should *see* the difference your paper claims. - **Keep it short and legible** — a focused clip (often a couple of minutes; check the current call for length/size limits, **待核实** per cycle) beats a long unedited recording. Caption or narrate what to look at. - **Anonymize it for review** — this is the most-missed double-blind leak. Blur or omit identifiable faces, mute or remove identifying voices and lab
- The video figure comes first
- The decision-criticality rule
- What the supplement typically holds
- Keep the body self-sufficient
- Anonymization sweep for the supplement
- Anti-patterns HRI reviewers flag
- Output format
What does the hri-supplementary skill do?
Use when planning the supplementary materials for an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — above all the video figure that shows the embodied interaction, plus study instruments, extended results, and appendices — deciding what a reviewer must see to judge the interaction versus what belongs outside the 8-page body, all anonymized for double-blind review.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.