hri-related-work
Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — covering HRI's crossing literatures (robotics, HCI, psychology, design), writing a delta-first argument that credits each community, and keeping self-citation compatible with double-blind review.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-related-work --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# HRI Related Work An HRI related-work section has a harder job than most: it must place the paper in **several literatures at once** — robotics, HCI, psychology/cognitive science, and design — because HRI reviewers are drawn from all of them, and each expects to see their field cited correctly. A section that reads as an ICRA lit review to a psychologist (or vice versa) signals the authors do not understand the interdisciplinary conversation they are joining. This skill covers coverage, positioning, and double-blind hygiene. ## Cover the crossing literatures Map your paper to the lanes it actually touches, and cite each in that community's terms: - **HRI conference and journal core** — the directly adjacent HRI work (prior HRI/THRI/JHRI studies on your construct or interaction). This is where reviewers look first; missing the nearest HRI neighbor is the classic fatal gap. - **Robotics** — the technical substrate (perception, control, behavior generation, autonomy) your robot relies on, if the contribution is technical/systems. - **HCI** — interaction design, evaluation methods, and any general-HCI phenomenon your interaction instantiates. - **Psychology / cognitive & social scienc
- Cover the crossing literatures
- Delta-first positioning
- Credit theory correctly (the interdisciplinary trap)
- Double-blind self-citation
- Placement and length
- Anti-patterns HRI reviewers flag
- Output format
What does the hri-related-work skill do?
Use when writing or auditing the related-work and positioning of an ACM/IEEE HRI full paper — covering HRI's crossing literatures (robotics, HCI, psychology, design), writing a delta-first argument that credits each community, and keeping self-citation compatible with double-blind review.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hri-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.