Agent skill · Documentation

hpca-author-response

Use when drafting an HPCA rebuttal and revision in the single combined window: triaging objections by what the window can fix, running a small number of new experiments, writing for the program-committee room and its champion, and revising the paper diff-minimally so response and revision agree.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-author-response --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-author-response/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# HPCA Author Response Use this during HPCA's **single combined rebuttal/revision window** — the one period in which you respond to reviews and revise the paper together. The goal is not to win an argument; it is to arm a champion at the program-committee meeting and to make the revised paper reflect what you promise. ## Triage objections by what the window can fix Sort every review comment before writing a word: - **Deciding objection** — the methodology or novelty concern the champion must overcome. Spend most of the window here. - **Fixable-and-worth-it** — a missing baseline, a sensitivity study, an unclear mechanism detail the window has time to address. - **Clarification** — a misreading you can correct in a sentence and reflect in the revision. - **Out of scope** — a request no short window can satisfy; acknowledge honestly and scope what you *can* show. | Objection type | Response move | Revision move | |---|---|---| | Deciding (methodology/novelty) | Direct evidence or a tight argument | Change the paper to match | | Missing baseline / sweep | A small new experiment | Add the result, mark it | | Mechanism unclear | One-paragraph clarification | Tighten the description | |

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Triage objections by what the window can fix
  2. Run few, decisive new experiments
  3. Write for the room and its champion
  4. Revise diff-minimally so response and revision agree
  5. Window pass
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the hpca-author-response skill do?

Use when drafting an HPCA rebuttal and revision in the single combined window: triaging objections by what the window can fix, running a small number of new experiments, writing for the program-committee room and its champion, and revising the paper diff-minimally so response and revision agree.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-author-response --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going