Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

history-of-religions

Use when targeting History of Religions or deciding whether a comparative-historical religious-studies manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its comparative-method and primary-source bar, textual/philological and morphological expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill history-of-religions --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/history-of-religions/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# History of Religions (history-of-religions) ## Journal positioning History of Religions, published by the University of Chicago Press, is the field-defining venue for the comparative and historical study of religious traditions worldwide. Its defining commitment is the **"history of religions" methodology** — cross-cultural, comparative, and morphological analysis of religious phenomena (myth, ritual, symbol, cosmology, the sacred) grounded in primary-source and philological control of specific traditions. A strong submission joins close, language-based study of particular materials to a comparative or historical argument that illuminates how a religious form works across cases or develops over time. It is distinct from `the-journal-of-religion`, which is broader and welcomes theology and philosophy of religion, and from `harvard-theological-review`, with its textual, biblical, and early-Christian focus: History of Religions foregrounds method — comparison and historical morphology — over confessional or constructive concerns. Theological advocacy, or comparison that floats free of sources and languages, is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid. I

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Journal positioning
  2. When to trigger
  3. Scope & topic fit
  4. Method & evidence bar
  5. Structure & house style
  6. Official-submission checklist
  7. Pre-submission self-check
  8. Common desk-reject triggers
  9. Re-routing decision
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the history-of-religions skill do?

Use when targeting History of Religions or deciding whether a comparative-historical religious-studies manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, its comparative-method and primary-source bar, textual/philological and morphological expectations, house style and review norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill history-of-religions --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going