grosskanzlei-ma-insolvenzreife

What it does

Provides an instruction set to generate a ready-to-use draft based on facts, norms, evidence, and requests for insolvency readiness and StaRUG thresholds in a large-law context. It foregrounds organizing the Auftrag into matter form, documents, decision-makers, form, deadline, and evidence; it aims to deliver a usable template with entries for Tatsachen / Norm / Beleg / Wertung / Gegenargument / nächster Schritt, and, if needed, a full text module.

How it works

The skill instructs the agent to: 1) classify the Auftrag by Gesellschaftsform, Dokument, decision-maker, form, deadline, evidence, and legal consequence, 2) separate Sachverhalt, Zuständigkeit, Zustimmung, Haftung, Vollzug, and next tactical step, 3) output a matrix with columns Tatsache / Norm / Beleg / Wertung / Gegenargument / nächster Schritt, and 4) provide a drafted text module when required. It references a norms radar (Paragraf 15, 16, 40, 43, 46 GmbHG; Paragraf 76, 93, 111 AktG; and others) and sources hygiene files, then follows a Prüfschema and a Beweislast/Fristen structure to guide content.

When to use it

Use when evaluating free-standing insolvency readiness and StaRUG-threshold checks in corporate/M&A, particularly to determine if action under Paragraf 17 InsO (Zahlungsunfähigkeit) or Paragraf 19 InsO (Überschuldung) triggers apply, and whether StaRUG is suitable.

What it can touch

The skill relies on the listed tool claude-code and references a template-based output: a matrix and potentially a fully formed text module. It uses file references like references/quellenhygiene.md and references/zitierweise.md as per the content.

Caveats

The skill centers on generating outputs guided by the provided norm texts, checks, and matrix structure; it does not guarantee final legal conclusions and requires senior review (Senior-Review-Gate) before release. It emphasizes using only normative content present in the supplied materials and avoids introducing outside assumptions.