gesellschafterstreit-eilantraege

What it does

The skill creates an urgent relief draft for shareholder disputes in GmbH contexts (Eilanträge) by assembling a suitable outline from the factual situation, applicable norms, evidence, and requested relief. It outputs a usable draft including requests, justifications, and an Anlagenlogik (attachment logic).

How it works

• Clarifies role, target output, deadlines, and required deliverable.
• Marks deadlines and urgent risks first, separating litigation types and limitations by jurisdiction.
• Verifies key norms (GmbHG, AktG, HGB, UmwG, etc.) live from current practice; avoids model-based quotations.
• Identifies proper addressees and parties (Mandant, Gegner, authorities, experts).
• Collects and checks documents and evidence (administrative acts, contracts, filings, expert reports); fills gaps via client inquiries; performs live checks for day-to-day norm changes.
• Maintains a focused problem scope on the specific Eilanträge task, using concrete factual and evidentiary elements.
• Produces outputs such as Beschluss-/Listenmatrix, Register-To-do, Board-/Beiratsvorlage, Closing-CP-Liste, Treuepflicht-Red-Team, Geschäftsführerhaftungsmemo or Mandanten-Decision-Paper.
• Verifies norms and decisions live or from the file; uses court-based sources with date, case number, and freely checkable sources; avoids blind quotes from model knowledge.

When to use it

Use when the client faces a shareholder dispute involving urgent measures (e.g., capital increase with pre-emptive rights exclusion, removal of managing director, or dilution) where time-sensitive relief is needed and an immediate filing or register-suspension is contemplated. The toolset is triggered by a dispute scenario requiring an eilantrag and related registers/processes.

What it can touch

The skill engages with procedural and substantive German corporate law norms, court procedures, and filing steps. It references activities like filing an eilantrag with the LG, requesting an Anmeldungs-Sperre beim Registergericht, and preparing a Verfügungsantrag, including supporting documents and annexes. It uses only live norms and documented filings as sources; no model-based citations are allowed.

Caveats

It emphasizes live verification of norms and requires explicit factual inputs and dates to proceed. It avoids speculative outcomes and relies on explicit steps and conditions described within the skill; it does not cite proprietary or non-public sources beyond court-friendly references and recognized statutes.