Agent skill · Design & Presentation

gec-research-design

Use when defending the research design of a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript — quantitative causal inference, qualitative case work and process tracing, experiments and surveys, or mixed-methods integration. GEC welcomes methodological pluralism but judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-research-design --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Global-Environmental-Change-Skills/skills/gec-research-design/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Design (gec-research-design) GEC is methodologically pluralist: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods work are all welcome, provided each is rigorous and connects the **conceptual framework** (`gec-conceptual-framework`) to evidence about the human dimensions of environmental change. This skill is mode-aware: pick the section that matches your work and defend it against the strongest alternative explanation. ## When to trigger - Specifying identification, case selection, sampling, or instrument design - A reviewer questioned causal claims, case choice, generalization, scale mismatch, or a confound - Designing a mixed-methods study and needing to justify the integration - Justifying how the design tests the framework's mechanism ## Quantitative / causal inference - **Estimand first.** State what you are estimating and the assumptions that license a causal reading (ignorability, parallel trends, exclusion, continuity). Defend them, don't assert them. - **Designs**: panel/DID and event study (use modern staggered-adoption estimators, not naive TWFE), IV (first-stage strength, exclusion), RDD, matching/weighting with balance + sensitivity, multilevel models for nested

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Quantitative / causal inference
  3. Qualitative / case-based
  4. Experiments & surveys
  5. Mixed-methods integration
  6. The scale & adjudication test (GEC-specific)
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Design objections by mode, and the GEC fix
  9. Worked micro-example (illustrative — mixed-methods coastal study)
  10. Calibration anchors (hedged)
  11. Output format
  12. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the gec-research-design skill do?

Use when defending the research design of a Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscript — quantitative causal inference, qualitative case work and process tracing, experiments and surveys, or mixed-methods integration. GEC welcomes methodological pluralism but judges each tradition on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill gec-research-design --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going