Agent skill · AI & Agents

formal-verification-guide

Formal methods, theorem proving, and model checking for CS research

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill formal-verification-guide --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/cs/formal-verification-guide/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 3,244
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Formal Verification Guide A skill for applying formal methods to verify software and hardware correctness. Covers model checking, interactive theorem proving, specification languages, and practical verification workflows used in systems and programming language research. ## Verification Approaches Overview ### Methods Comparison | Approach | Technique | Strengths | Limitations | |----------|----

More from Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the formal-verification-guide skill do?

Formal methods, theorem proving, and model checking for CS research

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill formal-verification-guide --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going