Agent skill · Data & Analytics

finman-empirical-design

Use when the sample construction, variable measurement, panel structure, or inference of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript is fragile — before identification can be trusted or exhibits finalized. Hardens the data layer; it does not establish the causal claim (finman-identification) or run robustness (finman-robustness).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill finman-empirical-design --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 9 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Financial-Management-Skills/skills/finman-empirical-design/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Empirical Design (finman-empirical-design) ## When to trigger - The sample comes from CRSP / Compustat / a vendor feed and the screens and survivorship choices are not documented - A key variable (leverage, payout, governance index, a return measure) has several definitions and you picked one without justification - The panel mixes frequencies, has look-ahead bias, or merges datasets on a fragile key - Standard errors are reported but the clustering and cross-sectional/time dependence are not justified ## The FM empirical-design bar FM publishes empirical finance across corporate, asset-pricing, and banking data, so the design layer is judged on whether **a competent referee could reconstruct your sample and trust your measures**. The journal's "less weight on trivial robustness" stance is a double-edged sword: it means you should not bury the paper in redundant checks, *but* it raises the premium on getting the **primary design right the first time** — the screens, the variable definitions, the merge, and the inference. FM referees in corporate finance are especially alert to silent sample screens, point-in-time vs. restated accounting data, and clustering that ignores the panel

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The FM empirical-design bar
  3. The data-layer audit
  4. Hardening sequence
  5. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  9. Data-source notes specific to finance
  10. Referee pushback mapped to the design fix
  11. When the design choice is itself the contribution
  12. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the finman-empirical-design skill do?

Use when the sample construction, variable measurement, panel structure, or inference of a Financial Management (FM) manuscript is fragile — before identification can be trusted or exhibits finalized. Hardens the data layer; it does not establish the causal claim (finman-identification) or run robustness (finman-robustness).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill finman-empirical-design --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going