Agent skill · Data & Analytics

facct-reproducibility

Use when strengthening ACM FAccT transparency and reproducibility — releasing code, data, and analysis for quantitative audits; documenting datasets and models with datasheets, model cards, and data statements; making qualitative and participatory work auditable without breaking confidentiality; pinning provenance for scraped and model-generated data; and keeping the paper, the supplementary material, and any released artifact consistent.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: FAccT-Skills/skills/facct-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# FAccT Reproducibility Use this before submission and again before camera-ready. At FAccT, transparency is not only the *subject* of the field — it is a norm the community holds its own papers to. But FAccT reproducibility is broader than "does the code run": it spans **releasing and documenting** the data and models behind an audit, making a **qualitative** study auditable without exposing participants, and being honest where confidentiality or proprietary access genuinely bars release. The goal is that a competent reader could trace how you got from evidence to conclusion — and judge whether the harm you claim is real. ## Transparency map - **Map each finding to a verifiable location** — a paper section, a table generated from released analysis, a codebook, or a documented case record. - **For quantitative audits:** release the analysis code, the dataset (or documented access), the exact metrics and subgroup definitions, and the seeds/versions — enough that a reader could re-run the disaggregation and reach your gaps. - **For qualitative/participatory work:** release what can be shared safely — the interview protocol, the codebook, aggregate coded results, consent materials — an

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Transparency map
  2. Documentation-and-availability audit
  3. Provenance pinning
  4. Degrees of reproducibility (state the one you achieved)
  5. Vignette: a mixed-methods accountability study
  6. Consistency and camera-ready pass
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the facct-reproducibility skill do?

Use when strengthening ACM FAccT transparency and reproducibility — releasing code, data, and analysis for quantitative audits; documenting datasets and models with datasheets, model cards, and data statements; making qualitative and participatory work auditable without breaking confidentiality; pinning provenance for scraped and model-generated data; and keeping the paper, the supplementary material, and any released artifact consistent.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going