Agent skill

exploratory-autoresearch

Use when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that explores the space broadly rather than hill-climbing one approach. A temperature scheduler replaces the usual hypothesis step: it forces several wild, diverse swings (full rewrites, different architectures/regimes) early, then enters an adaptive phase that picks swing / merge / exploit per iteration — with a hard stagnation guard that bans further small-step exploits once they run too long, forcing a pivot back to a swing or merge. Tracks an approaches.md registry and a move_type per iteration; analyses every run before the next move.

gaashergithub.com/gaasherGitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill exploratory-autoresearch --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 16 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 0.1.0
Requires: Requires Python 3.9+
Path: loops/exploratory-autoresearch/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 146
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Exploratory Autoresearch Loop This loop runs hot. Like the standard `ml-autoresearch`, every experiment is followed by a diagnostic analysis pass. **Unlike** it, the *type* of change at each iteration is set by a **temperature scheduler**, not the agent's intuition: it forces wide, diverse swings early (full rewrites, fundamentally different architectures and training regimes), then drops into an adaptive phase that chooses between **swing** (a fresh wild approach), **merge** (combine two registered approaches), or **exploit** (a focused tweak of the best). A **stagnation guard** bans exploit once it has run `<stagnation_limit>` times in a row, forcing a pivot back to swing or merge so the loop never gets stuck hill-climbing. The feedback signal is `<metric>` read from the run log; an `approaches.md` registry and a `move_type` per iteration are what make the scheduler work. You are the researcher. Do not pause to ask for permission once the loop is running. ## When to use Use for an open-ended ML campaign where you want forced breadth before refinement — the scheduler guarantees you sample several distinct families before converging, and the stagnation guard prevents endless smal

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to use
  2. Setup
  3. Initialise the sandbox
  4. The loop (LOOP FOREVER — until interrupted)
  5. The scheduler (step 2 — this is the loop's identity)
  6. Counter update (step 11)
  7. The three moves (step 3)
  8. Analysing (step 7 — MANDATORY; produces real artifacts)
  9. The registry (step 8 — approaches.md, swing and merge only)
  10. Ledger
  11. Constraints
  12. Stops
Ships with 1 file
  • examples/run.example.yaml
More from Agent-Loop-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the exploratory-autoresearch skill do?

Use when the user wants an autonomous ML research loop that explores the space broadly rather than hill-climbing one approach. A temperature scheduler replaces the usual hypothesis step: it forces several wild, diverse swings (full rewrites, different architectures/regimes) early, then enters an adaptive phase that picks swing / merge / exploit per iteration — with a hard stagnation guard that bans further small-step exploits once they run too long, forcing a pivot back to a swing or merge. Tracks an approaches.md registry and a move_type per iteration; analyses every run before the next move.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills --skill exploratory-autoresearch --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills, a repository with 146 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going