Agent skill · Design & Presentation

expecon-robustness

Use when an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) result may be a power artifact, multiple-comparisons artifact, or sensitive to the inference unit, exclusions, or design choices. Hardens the statistical case; it does not design the experiment or draft prose.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill expecon-robustness --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Experimental-Economics-Skills/skills/expecon-robustness/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Robustness & Inference (expecon-robustness) ## When to trigger - A referee asks "is the study adequately powered?" and there is no sample-size justification - You ran several treatments / outcomes and report many p-values without correction - Inference treats individual decisions as independent when subjects interact in groups - Results move when you change the exclusion rule, the outcome measure, or pool/unpool sessions ## The ExpEcon inference stack Experimental control buys clean identification; it does not buy clean *inference*. Five things separate a robust ExpEcon paper from a fragile one. ### 1. Power / sample-size justification (do this before data, defend it after) - Pre-specify the **minimum detectable effect (MDE)** that is economically meaningful and the power to detect it, at the **correct unit** (session or matching group, not individual decision). A study powered on individual n but analyzed at the group level is overstated. - Use pilot or prior-literature variances; for interactive games, simulate at the group level. Report the realized power for the primary comparison, not just a post-hoc "we found p<0.05." - A clean, well-powered **null** is publishable here — e

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The ExpEcon inference stack
  3. 1. Power / sample-size justification (do this before data, defend it after)
  4. 2. The unit-of-observation problem
  5. 3. Multiple treatments & multiple hypotheses
  6. 4. Non-parametric vs. parametric
  7. 5. Robustness to design and analysis choices
  8. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  9. Checklist
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  12. Referee pushback mapped to the fix
  13. A minimal robustness panel to pre-build
  14. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the expecon-robustness skill do?

Use when an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) result may be a power artifact, multiple-comparisons artifact, or sensitive to the inference unit, exclusions, or design choices. Hardens the statistical case; it does not design the experiment or draft prose.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill expecon-robustness --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going