Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

eursr-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to a comparative, theory-driven quantitative debate rather than a national note. Stakes the contribution in a European sociological debate and names the closest prior estimates; it does not write the literature review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (eursr-literature-positioning) An ESR paper must convince a comparative-minded quantitative audience that the contribution moves a **live European debate** — about stratification, education, labor markets, family, migration, or attitudes — and not just add a coefficient for one more country. Positioning places the paper in that debate and shows precisely what it changes. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the contribution statement - A reviewer said you "missed the European literature" or "don't engage the comparative debate" - Your national citations are solid but the paper doesn't connect to the cross-national frontier - Distinguishing your contribution from the closest prior estimates ## How ESR wants the literature engaged 1. **Frame a debate, not a citation list.** Identify the live theoretical disagreement (e.g., relative vs. absolute mobility, primary vs. secondary effects in education, assimilation vs. boundary accounts of integration) and cite the works that *define* it. 2. **Engage the comparative frontier.** ESR readers know the cross-national literature; cite the harmonized-data studies (ESS / EU-SILC / SOEP / compara

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How ESR wants the literature engaged
  3. Cross-national engagement (an ESR demand)
  4. Desk-reject and early-rejection patterns at ESR
  5. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  6. Referee pushback → ESR-specific fix
  7. Calibration anchors
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
  10. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the eursr-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a European Sociological Review (ESR) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a contribution to a comparative, theory-driven quantitative debate rather than a national note. Stakes the contribution in a European sociological debate and names the closest prior estimates; it does not write the literature review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going