etp-review-process
Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (etp-review-process) ## When to trigger - You just submitted and want to know what to expect and when - A decision letter arrived and you need to read the signal (reject / major R&R / minor) - You are deciding whether an R&R is winnable and how much to invest - You want to understand ETP's developmental review culture before you respond - You are weighing a resubmission to ETP vs. a reroute to JBV/SEJ/AMJ ## How ETP review actually runs ETP uses **double-anonymized peer review** through ScholarOne, typically with a handling/associate editor and **two to three reviewers**. Like its top management/entrepreneurship peers, ETP runs a **developmental review model**: reviewers and editors aim to help a promising paper become publishable across rounds, so a **major R&R is the realistic "good" first outcome** for a strong submission — outright first-round acceptance is rare. Expect substantive, theory-heavy reviews and an editor letter that prioritizes among reviewer concerns. Calibrate volatile specifics (current turnaround times, acceptance rate, editor) on the SAGE journal page and your ScholarOne dashboard (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). ## Reading the decision letter | Decision
- When to trigger
- How ETP review actually runs
- Reading the decision letter
- Why ETP papers get desk-rejected
- Choosing whether to fight for the R&R
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Worked vignette (illustrative)
- Output format
What does the etp-review-process skill do?
Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.