er-workflow
Use when deciding which er-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-workflow --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# 经济研究工作流（er-workflow） ## 总览 这是路由器，它不替代任何专用 Skill。它告诉你**当前阶段应该用哪一个 er-* skill**。 默认假设：除非用户明确说明目标期刊不是《经济研究》，否则按 CSSCI《经济研究》的编委口味处理。 工具定位为**「生成 + 诊断」双模**：既能诊断当前稿件的瓶颈、给出可填模板，也能直接产出引言、机制段、摘要、回复信等初稿段落供你修改。 ## 触发时机 - 用户问"我下一步该做什么？" - 用户甩过来一份初稿，需要判断当前瓶颈 - 实证、写作、回复来回切，状态混乱 - 收到了《经济研究》的外审意见，需要切换到 rebuttal 模式 ## 路由表 | 当前症状 | 下一个 Skill | |----------------------------------------------|---------------------------| | 选题想法模糊，担心理论贡献不够 | `er-topic-selection` | | 引言从遥远背景写起 / 没剧透结论 / 贡献写成"丰富研究" | `er-introduction` | | 文献综述缺中文经典 / 缺理论文献 | `er-literature-review` | | 缺理论分析与假设推导 / 假设无方向、不可证伪 | `er-theory-hypotheses` | | 数据来源含糊 / 变量定义用描述不给公式 / 样本筛选不透明 | `er-data-sample` | | 实证只有 OLS / 交叠 DID 只用 TWFE / 弱工具 | `er-identification` | | 主结果有了，但没机制分析（或还在跑中介三步法） | `er-mechanism` | | 没切异质性 / 切分维度无理论指引 | `er-heterogeneity` | | 缺稳健性 / 换度量或样本结论就翻 | `er-robustness` | | 表格列数过多 / 注释不规范 / 手抄表格 | `er-tables-figures` | | 文末没有政策含义，或写得太"操作化" | `er-policy-implication` | | 摘要写成套话 / 英文梗概不合五要素 / 中英不对齐 | `er-abstract` | | 通篇空话套话 / 政策建议是"加强完善推进"四件套 | `er-style` | | 投稿前想先过一遍高频审稿质疑、堵漏洞 | `er-reviewer-lens` | | 数据代码乱、无法一键复现、扩展资料没准备好 | `er-reproducibility` | | 准备投稿，需要 checklist | `er-submission` | | 收到 R&R，需要写回复信 | `er-rebuttal` | ##
- 总览
- 触发时机
- 路由表
- 默认顺序
- 决策口诀
- 与《管理世界》Skills 的差异
- 反模式
- 输出格式
What does the er-workflow skill do?
Use when deciding which er-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill er-workflow --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.