Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

en-humanities-journal-workflow

Use when deciding which English humanities journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 36-journal humanities roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (history / philosophy / literary studies / classics / art history / religion / linguistics / musicology), contribution type (argument, interpretation, theory, edition), and the venue's house style and review norms.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill en-humanities-journal-workflow --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/en-humanities-journal-workflow/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Humanities journal workflow (en-humanities-journal-workflow) ## Purpose This is the routing skill for the humanities bundle. It does not replace a single-journal profile; it first classifies the manuscript by **sub-field, contribution type, and method/approach**, then routes into the matching per-journal skill for fit and re-framing. It is a sibling to `en-natsci-journal-workflow`, `en-engtech-journal-workflow`, and `en-journal-workflow`. ## Ask four things first 1. **Sub-field:** history, philosophy, literary studies, classics, art/architectural history, religious studies, linguistics, or musicology/aesthetics? 2. **Contribution type:** an original argument or interpretation, a theoretical or conceptual intervention, a recovery of new primary sources/evidence, a critical edition or attribution, or a methodological/historiographical reframing? 3. **Approach:** archival/empirical, close reading/textual, analytic/formal, theoretical/critical, or object-/image-based? 4. **Audience:** the whole field (a generalist flagship), a period/area specialty, or a method/theory community? ## Quick routing | Manuscript signature | Prefer skill | |---|---| | Broad, field-defining historical argu

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Purpose
  2. Ask four things first
  3. Quick routing
  4. Sibling-journal disambiguation
  5. Decision rules
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the en-humanities-journal-workflow skill do?

Use when deciding which English humanities journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 36-journal humanities roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (history / philosophy / literary studies / classics / art history / religion / linguistics / musicology), contribution type (argument, interpretation, theory, edition), and the venue's house style and review norms.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill en-humanities-journal-workflow --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going