emnlp-review-process
Use when explaining or strategizing around EMNLP's two-stage pipeline — ACL Rolling Review scoring with soundness, excitement, and overall recommendation, area-chair meta-reviews, the commitment step, and conference-side decisions by Senior Area Chairs into Main, Findings, or rejection — including resubmission dynamics and ethics flags.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill emnlp-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# EMNLP Review Process Use this to reason about what happens to the paper after upload. EMNLP outsources reviewing to ACL Rolling Review and keeps only the decision: understanding which body controls which lever is most of review-stage strategy. Mechanics below are the May 2026 cycle configuration (checked 2026-07-08); ARR revises its own rules midyear, so reconfirm on `aclrollingreview.org` before relying on any of it. ## Pipeline anatomy ```text ARR side (owns reviewing) Conference side (owns deciding) ───────────────────────── ─────────────────────────────── submit PDF + checklist (May 25) → AC assigned, reviewers assigned → 3(ish) reviews, scored commit reviewed paper (by Aug 2) → author response + discussion → SACs rank committed papers (Jul 7-13) → PCs set boundaries → AC meta-review (Jul 30) → Main / Findings / reject (Aug 20) → OR: skip commitment, revise, resubmit to a later cycle ``` Nothing on the left is a decision; nothing on the right adds new reviews. A paper is therefore argued twice — once in front of reviewers, once (silently, via the record) in front of SACs — and the response you write in July serves both audiences. ## What the scores mean strategically Since Fe
- Pipeline anatomy
- What the scores mean strategically
- The meta-review is the product
- Resubmission dynamics
- Ethics and integrity lanes
- Scale effects you should price in
- Reading a review packet in ten minutes
- Output format
What does the emnlp-review-process skill do?
Use when explaining or strategizing around EMNLP's two-stage pipeline — ACL Rolling Review scoring with soundness, excitement, and overall recommendation, area-chair meta-reviews, the commitment step, and conference-side decisions by Senior Area Chairs into Main, Findings, or rejection — including resubmission dynamics and ethics flags.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill emnlp-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.