eignungspruefung

What it does

Guides a legal or procurement-focused AI to perform a bidder eligibility check in a public procurement procedure, specifically within Fachanwalt Vergaberecht. It emphasizes identifying and separating deadlines and urgency (Widerspruch, Klage, Einspruch, Rechtsmittel, Verjährung, Verwirkung, Rüge-, Anzeige-, Anmelde- und Ausschlussfristen) and verifying core norms and procedures related to eligibility (Eignungskriterien, Ausschlussgründe, Selbstreinigung, Eignungsleihe, EEE). It instructs to determine the responsible party, collect documents and evidence, and produce an output package (Eignungsnachweis-Paket) or a challenge against an exclusion. It references specific statutory provisions (e.g., § 122 GWB, §§ 123–125 GWB, § 50 VgV) and standard documents (PQ-Verzeichnis, EEE). It also provides a decision framework for whether to pursue a challenge and how to structure subsequent documents or arguments. The skill’s workflow includes clarifying roles, marking deadlines and risks, verifying normative sources live, identifying recipients, and compiling evidence.

How it works

• Clarify who acts, the target decision, deadline, and desired output.
• Mark deadlines and urgent risks using field-specific categories; separate different types of deadlines by jurisdiction and avoid cross-field contamination.
• Verify controlling norms by live checks on official sources (gesetze-im-internet.de, dejure.org, eur-lex.europa.eu, and official portals) without relying on model knowledge.
• Identify the responsible party and choose appropriate recipients (Mandant, Gegner, Behörde, Gericht, Sachverständige, ggf. EU-/internationale Stelle).
• Collect and audit documents and evidence (Verwaltungsakte, Vertragsurkunden, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Sachverständigengutachten, externe Beweismittel); obtain missing proofs via file access or client inquiry; perform live verification of norm changes and administrative practice.

When to use it

Use when evaluating bidder eligibility in a Vergabeverfahren, particularly if a bidder is excluded or seeks to prove/evidence eligibility (Eignung nachweisen). Trigger conditions include determining which Eignungskriterien were stated, which self-declarations or evidence were required, and whether exclusion grounds apply, including self-cleaning possibilities.

What it can touch

• Tools: claude-code
• Documents and references: normative sections and checklists (e.g., § 122 GWB, § 123 GWB, § 124 GWB, § 125 GWB, § 50 VgV, § 47 VgV, § 42–48 VgV)
• Output artifacts: Eignungsnachweis-Paket, Rüge, or Selbstreinigung statements, and potentially a strategic template for further action.

Caveats

• Facts must be drawn from stated norms and procedural outlines; no speculative outcomes or promises beyond the explicitly described outputs (e.g., Eignungsnachweis-Paket or Angriff gegen Ausschluss).
• The content references multiple jurisdictions and live sources; ensure live verification and correct jurisdictional application.