Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

eer-rebuttal

Use when a European Economic Review (EER) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-with-appeal grounds) and a response strategy and letter are needed. Plans the revision and drafts the point-by-point response; it does not run new estimation or rewrite the whole paper.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eer-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: European-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/eer-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Rebuttal & Response Letter (eer-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - An EER **R&R** (major or minor) arrived and you need a revision plan + response letter - Referee reports conflict and you must triage what to do - You are weighing a formal **appeal** of a reject (one appeal per submission) - You need to convert reports into a credible, point-by-point response ## The EER revision reality EER decisions are **accept / R&R (major or minor) / reject**, with desk rejects possible without review. Under **single-anonymized** review the referees know who you are — the response must be **professional, complete, and non-defensive**. The editor decides; referees advise. A successful R&R does the **substantive work the reports ask for**, documents it transparently, and makes the editor's re-read easy. EER permits **one formal appeal** per submission (Elsevier appeal policy; the decision is final) — reserve it for a clear factual/process error, not disagreement with judgment. ## Building the response ### 1. Triage the reports - Sort every comment into: **must-do** (identification/robustness/credibility), **should-do** (clarity, added test), **discuss-only** (out-of-scope or contradicting another r

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The EER revision reality
  3. Building the response
  4. 1. Triage the reports
  5. 2. Do the substantive work first
  6. 3. Draft the point-by-point letter
  7. 4. Keep the paper coherent
  8. Checklist
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the eer-rebuttal skill do?

Use when a European Economic Review (EER) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-with-appeal grounds) and a response strategy and letter are needed. Plans the revision and drafts the point-by-point response; it does not run new estimation or rewrite the whole paper.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eer-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going