Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

eer-literature-positioning

Use when the contribution-vs-frontier claim is fuzzy, oversold, or under-cited for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript spanning any field of economics. Sharpens the gap and the marginal contribution; it does not fix identification or prose.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eer-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: European-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/eer-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (eer-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The "what's new here" sentence is vague, defensive, or missing - Reviewers say the contribution is "incremental" or "already known" - The related-work section is a list of citations, not an argument - You cannot name the 3–5 papers your result directly displaces or extends ## The EER positioning bar EER is **general-interest across all of economics**, so the contribution must be legible to a reader **outside** your subfield while withstanding the scrutiny of those **inside** it. That means a two-layer positioning: (1) a **broad-interest hook** — why a generalist should care — and (2) a **precise frontier delta** — exactly which result you extend, overturn, or quantify, with the closest 3–5 papers named. Single-anonymized review means the **referees are likely the authors you cite**: be accurate and fair, neither dismissive nor over-deferential. ## Positioning moves ### 1. Locate the frontier precisely - Name the **closest current papers** (not the founding classics) your result speaks to. - For each, state in one clause **what they did** and **what they left open**. - Distinguish your contribution from concu

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The EER positioning bar
  3. Positioning moves
  4. 1. Locate the frontier precisely
  5. 2. State the marginal contribution as a delta
  6. 3. Position across fields where relevant
  7. 4. Calibrate the claim
  8. Checklist
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the eer-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when the contribution-vs-frontier claim is fuzzy, oversold, or under-cited for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript spanning any field of economics. Sharpens the gap and the marginal contribution; it does not fix identification or prose.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eer-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going