Agent skill · Documentation

ectheory-rebuttal

Use when an Econometric Theory (ET) decision letter arrives and a response strategy and letter are needed — handling proof-checking referee objections, fixing assumptions and gaps, and using the online Supplement, then writing a point-by-point response. It structures the revision, not the proofs themselves.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ectheory-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Econometric-Theory-Skills/skills/ectheory-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Rebuttal & Revision (ectheory-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - An ET decision letter arrived: revise-and-resubmit, or major/conditional revision - You have referee reports challenging assumptions, proof steps, or generality - You are unsure how to prioritize conflicting referee demands - The revised manuscript exists and you need to draft the response letter ## ET reality: theory referees challenge the proof At a theorem-proof journal the referees are checking your **mathematics**, not your causal story. The handling editor's letter sets priorities; under the editorial leadership from 1 January 2026 (Guggenberger, Su, Sun), expect demanding technical review. Because review is **single-anonymous**, the referees already know who you are — keep responses on the merits. ## Triage protocol 1. **Decode the editor.** The editor's letter ranks the issues. A point the editor underscores is binding; address it fully this round. 2. **Classify every comment.** Tag each: *fundamental* (a gap, an unjustified assumption, an incorrect limit claim — requires new math), *clarification* (rewrite/explain the assumption or step), or *disagreement* (you will push back, with a precise counter-argument or

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. ET reality: theory referees challenge the proof
  3. Triage protocol
  4. Response-letter structure
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Mapping referee objections to the venue-specific fix
  8. Worked vignette and the disagreement protocol
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ectheory-rebuttal skill do?

Use when an Econometric Theory (ET) decision letter arrives and a response strategy and letter are needed — handling proof-checking referee objections, fixing assumptions and gaps, and using the online Supplement, then writing a point-by-point response. It structures the revision, not the proofs themselves.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ectheory-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going