ecai-supplementary
Use when deciding what goes in the ECAI 7-page body versus the anonymized supplement — splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing a reviewer needs to judge the paper lives outside the tight body, given there is no unlimited in-paper appendix and no separate artifact track.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# ECAI Supplementary Material ECAI's defining constraint is the **7-page body** (references are the only overflow: 1 page in a standalone ECAI, 2 pages in IJCAI-ECAI 2026). There is **no unlimited in-paper appendix**: the paper is exactly its 7 pages plus references. A separate **supplement** can carry proofs, extra tables, and code — but it is optional reading for reviewers, so the split must be made by **decision-criticality**, not convenience. ## The one rule > **Anything a reviewer needs in order to judge the paper must be in the 7-page body.** > The supplement holds *support and detail*, never the claim, the core argument, or the key > evidence. Reviewers may or may not open the supplement, and they read it under time pressure. If your central result only becomes convincing after page 7, the paper is under-argued. ## Belongs in the body (7 pages) - The **problem statement, contribution, and the claim** in precise form. - The **core of the argument**: the main theorem statement and proof idea, or the main experimental result with the comparison that supports the claim. - The **key table/figure** a reviewer uses to decide, with enough of the protocol to trust it. - Threats/limit
- The one rule
- Belongs in the body (7 pages)
- Belongs in the supplement (anonymized)
- The decision-criticality test
- Compression tactics before you exile content
- Double-blind and anonymity
- Format and mechanics (verify per cycle)
- Output format
What does the ecai-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what goes in the ECAI 7-page body versus the anonymized supplement — splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing a reviewer needs to judge the paper lives outside the tight body, given there is no unlimited in-paper appendix and no separate artifact track.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecai-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.