eacl-supplementary
Use when organizing an EACL paper's body, mandatory Limitations section, appendices, and anonymized supplementary archive so that no decision-critical content hides where ACL Rolling Review reviewers are not obliged to read, and so the content-page budget carries the whole argument on its own.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# EACL Supplementary Material Use this to decide **what goes where** across an EACL submission: the content pages, the Limitations section, the appendices, and the anonymized supplementary archive. The governing rule in ARR is that **reviewers must read the content pages but are not obliged to read appendices or the archive** — so anything decision-critical that lives outside the body is a self-inflicted risk. Reopen the current ARR CFP before finalizing structure. ## The placement hierarchy | Location | Reviewer obligation | Put here | |---|---|---| | Content pages (8 long / 4 short) | Must read | The claim, method, key results, the argument | | Limitations (after conclusion, uncounted) | Must read | Honest scope, failure modes, threats to validity | | References (unlimited) | As needed | Citations | | Appendices (in-PDF, after refs) | May skip | Proof detail, extra tables, full hyperparameters | | Anonymized archive (OpenReview) | May skip | Code, data, prompts, model outputs | ## The self-containedness test - Read only the content pages and the Limitations section. Can a reviewer **accept or reject on that alone**? If a core mechanism, the main baseline, or the headline result l
- The placement hierarchy
- The self-containedness test
- Limitations is body, not backmatter
- Appendix organization
- Anonymized archive hygiene
- Common misplacements to catch
- Output format
What does the eacl-supplementary skill do?
Use when organizing an EACL paper's body, mandatory Limitations section, appendices, and anonymized supplementary archive so that no decision-critical content hides where ACL Rolling Review reviewers are not obliged to read, and so the content-page budget carries the whole argument on its own.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eacl-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.