Agent skill

domain-authority-auditor

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, citations, or 域名权威/网站可信度. Runs 40-item CITE scoring with veto checks.

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill domain-authority-auditor --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 35 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 9.9.9
Declared author: aaron-he-zhu
Requires: Claude Code, skills.sh, ClawHub, Vercel Labs, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Amp, Gemini CLI, Kimi Code, Qwen Code…
Path: skills/analysis/domain-authority-auditor/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

Review
written from the skill's own SKILL.md · Aug 5, 2026

What it does

Evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions, producing an audit report with per-item scoring, dimension scores, and a prioritized action plan. It also flags critical manipulation signals and can pair with another audit for combined diagnosis.

How it works

The skill performs a full 40-item audit with Pass/Partial/Fail scoring for each item. It calculates scores for four dimensions (C, I, T, E) from 0 to 100 each, then applies domain-type-specific weights to compute a weighted total. It detects critical issues that may veto the score and identifies Top 5 improvements for action. It can optionally cross-reference with CORE-EEAT for a combined diagnosis. The Quick Start prompts provide example commands to run the audit and produce a verdict and handoff summary. It includes a structured Skill Contract indicating gate verdict, required outputs, and data flow between memory locations.

When to use it

Use when domain credibility or citation trustworthiness is in question, including questions about how trustworthy a site is, whether a domain is credible, or when evaluating domain authority before campaigns, benchmarking competitors, or after link-building activities. Trigger phrases include audit domain authority, CITE audit, domain trust score, site authority, and related multilingual variants.

What this skill does

  1. Full 40-Item Audit: Scores every CITE check item as Pass/Partial/Fail
  2. Dimension Scoring: Calculates scores for all 4 dimensions (0-100 each)
  3. Weighted Totals: Applies domain-type-specific weights for CITE Score
  4. Critical Issue Detection: Flags critical manipulation signals that cap the score
  5. Priority Ranking: Identifies Top 5 improvements sorted by impact
  6. Action Plan: Generates specific, actionable improvement steps
  7. Cross-Reference: Optionally pairs with CORE-EEAT for combined diagnosis

Data Sources

The skill can operate with manual data or connected tools; it can pull backlink profiles, keyword rankings, citation data, knowledge graph signals, and brand mentions if connectors are available, otherwise it requests data from the user. It outputs a user-facing authority report and a reusable summary for archival storage, and promotes veto items and domain risks to hot cache memory.

Instructions

When a user requests a domain authority audit, the agent follows a preparation step to determine domain, domain type, and dimension weights, then executes the C + I Audit (20 items) and T + E Audit (20 items) in a structured format, marking unverifiable items as N/A — requires [data source] where needed. The final handoff includes a cap and score fields if required by the runbook, and a plain-language verdict at the top of the report.

From the SKILL.md

# Domain Authority Auditor > Based on [CITE Domain Rating](https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/cite-domain-rating). Full benchmark reference: [references/cite-domain-rating.md](https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills/blob/main/references/cite-domain-rating.md) This skill evaluates domain authority across 40 standardized criteria organized in 4 dimensions. It produces a comprehensive audit report with per-item scoring, dimension and weighted scores by domain type, veto item checks, and a prioritized action plan. **Sister skill**: [content-quality-auditor](https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/seo-geo-claude-skills/blob/main/cross-cutting/content-quality-auditor/SKILL.md) evaluates content at the page level (80 items). This skill evaluates the domain behind the content (40 items). Together they provide a complete 120-item assessment. > **Namespace note**: CITE uses C01-C10 for Citation items; CORE-EEAT uses C01-C10 for Contextual Clarity items. In combined 120-item assessments, prefix with the framework name (e.g., CITE-C01 vs CORE-C01) to avoid confusion. ## When This Must Trigger Use this when domain credibility or citation trustworthiness is in question — even if the user does

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When This Must Trigger
  2. What This Skill Does
  3. Quick Start
  4. Audit Your Domain
  5. Audit with Domain Type
  6. Comparative Audit
  7. Combined Assessment
  8. Skill Contract
  9. Data Sources
  10. Instructions
  11. Step 1: Preparation
  12. Step 2: C + I Audit (20 items)
  13. Step 3: T + E Audit (20 items)
  14. §1 · Handoff Schema (authoritative)
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the domain-authority-auditor skill do?

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, citations, or 域名权威/网站可信度. Runs 40-item CITE scoring with veto checks.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill domain-authority-auditor --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going