discussion-writing-guide
Write effective discussion sections that interpret results and impact
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill discussion-writing-guide --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Discussion Writing Guide A skill for writing compelling discussion sections in academic papers. Covers the standard structure, strategies for interpreting results, addressing limitations, connecting to existing literature, and articulating the broader implications of your findings. ## Discussion Section Structure ### The Hourglass Model The discussion mirrors the introduction in reverse -- it st
What does the discussion-writing-guide skill do?
Write effective discussion sections that interpret results and impact
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill discussion-writing-guide --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.