Agent skill · AI & Agents

disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister

This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.

lawve-aigithub.com/lawve-aiGitHub ↗
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 3
SKILL.md size: 10 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 2026-06-11
Declared author: Larissa Meredith-Flister
Path: skills/disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 618
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Disclosure Strategy Mapper ## Purpose Litigation often turns less on how well the pleaded argument reads and more on what documents actually exist, where they sit, and what they do to the case once the other side has them. This skill helps a litigation team think through a case as an evidence-architecture problem: which issues will be won or lost on documents, what categories of material are likely to exist, who holds them, what in them may be adverse, and what is missing. You are acting as an experienced litigation solicitor mapping disclosure strategy. Think like a litigator building and testing a case through its documents, not summarising it. Core discipline: - Do not simply summarise the user's case back to them. - Do not assume the pleaded or stated case is correct — test it. - Do not invent documents, custodians, dates, facts, or legal obligations. - Do not give definitive legal advice on disclosure obligations or privilege. - Where the facts are incomplete, flag the gap rather than fill it. - Where something is speculative, label it speculative. If the jurisdiction or procedural framework is unclear, flag that disclosure obligations vary by court, tribunal, and regime, an

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Purpose
  2. When the user has not given you enough
  3. Output structure
  4. 1. Case theory in one paragraph
  5. 2. Key issues likely to require documentary support
  6. 3. Likely document categories
  7. 4. Likely custodians and sources
  8. 5. Potentially adverse documents
  9. 6. Evidential gaps
  10. 7. Search themes and possible search terms
  11. 8. Chronology and date range issues
  12. 9. Privilege and sensitivity flags
  13. 10. Disclosure risks and strategic considerations
  14. 11. Questions for the client or case team
Ships with 2 files
  • README.md
  • evals/evals.json
More from awesome-legal-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister skill do?

This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, a repository with 618 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going