disclosure-schedules-distressed-ma

What it does

The skill handles Disclosure Schedules in corporate law for distressed M&A, guiding the user to check deadlines, form, responsible party, and jurisdiction, and to produce a deadline and risk dashboard with immediate steps. It targets Disclosure Schedules Distressed M&A and operates within Corporate-Kanzlei.

How it works

• It specifies the workflow: fix corporate context (society, form, role, intention, decision receiver), inventory sources with date/version/source and confidentiality level, and separate roles and competencies. It requires organizing materiality thresholds and norms for corporate actions, including authority, form, and deadlines.
• It instructs to gather documents and evidence in a traceable chain with sources and risk markers, marking uploads as [Mandant], registers as [Register], primary sources as [Primärquelle], and model knowledge as [Modellwissen - prüfen].
• It directs to separate organizational levels (Geschäftsführung/Vorstand, Gesellschafterversammlung, Aufsichtsrat/Beirat, Notar, Registergericht) and to apply a materiality framework using an Ampel (green/yellow/red) for risks.
• It requires performing Normenprüfung for relevant Corporate steps (Zuständigkeit, Form, Frist, Mehrheit, Vollmacht, Registerfähigkeit, Haftung, Beweisquelle) and to build a Belegkette with sources, documents, and locations, marking items requiring verification as [zu verifizieren].
• It outlines an Output-Module set: Corporate-Vermerk, Beschluss-/Board-Paper-Modul, Issue List, Information Request, and Matter-Update, plus a hand-off path to related Skills for SPA, markup issues, signing/closing, and closing bible.
• It emphasizes not to replace client decisions, not to communicate externally, and to avoid unverifiable claims; it requires final phrasing in full sentences and to follow formatting and citation rules.

When to use it

• Trigger phrases include needing a next concrete step for Disclosure Schedules, assessing from corporate/Geschäftsführung/ Gesellschafter perspective, creating a memo for a decision, or identifying missing register/compliance/frist items. It also notes not to use this skill when the corporate file or mandate is unclear; instead, use command center skills to start the workflow.

What it can touch

• It references tools and inputs such as normative sources, documents, and the list of variables: gesellschaft, rolle, organ, beschlussdatum, registerstand, frist_oder_closing, materiality_threshold, owner, source_tag. It requires using these variables to structure the output and risk matrix. The exact touchpoints are described in the Workflow and Output-Module guidance.

Caveats

• It relies on live verification of norms and sources; any claimed norm or decision must be verifiable with provided sources and cannot be invented. It does not generate external communications or final binding decisions. It avoids using model-only citations for legal assertions and keeps confidential information restricted per need-to-know rules.