did-reviewer
双重差分(DID)实证审查Skill。做DID分析前必须检查平行趋势假设、画图可视化、报告违背情况。触发词：DID审查/双重差分检查/平行趋势/DiD reviewer/difference-in-differences
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill did-reviewer --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# did-reviewer — 双重差分 (DID) 实证审查Skill > 本 Skill 是 DID（双重差分）实证分析的**强制检查清单**，在执行 DID 分析前和分析后都必须按本 Skill 检查：平行趋势假设、可视化、违背报告、稳健性。**不符合本 Skill 要求的 DID 分析不得发表。** ## 适用场景 - 做 DID 分析前设计检验方案 - 审稿人审查 DID 论文时使用 - 研究者自查 DID 实证结果时使用 - 评估已发表 DID 论文的质量时使用 ## 核心理念 **DID 是识别因果的"近似实验"，但前提是平行趋势假设成立**。若该假设不成立，则 DID 估计量是有偏的，无论结果多么"显著"。 常见错误： - ❌ 只报告处理组和对照组的系数，不检验平行趋势 - ❌ 平行趋势检验图不加置信区间 - ❌ 不报告政策提前发生的违背情况（anticipation e
What does the did-reviewer skill do?
双重差分(DID)实证审查Skill。做DID分析前必须检查平行趋势假设、画图可视化、报告违背情况。触发词：DID审查/双重差分检查/平行趋势/DiD reviewer/difference-in-differences
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill did-reviewer --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.