Agent skill · Data & Analytics

cscw-supplementary

Use when assembling supplementary materials for a CSCW submission — appendices, codebooks, interview guides, survey instruments, analysis code, and data extracts — deciding what accompanies a journal-model paper, anonymized end to end and consistent across R&R rounds.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-supplementary --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: CSCW-Skills/skills/cscw-supplementary/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# CSCW Supplementary Materials Supplements at CSCW serve a journal-style review: they let reviewers *verify* the methods section without bloating a paper already policed by the contribution-vs- length standard. Because Revise and Resubmit sends the paper back to the same reviewers, the supplement is also a **versioned record** — round-two reviewers can and do compare it against round one. ## What goes where | Material | Main paper | Appendix | Separate supplement file | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Method summary + key instrument excerpts | ✓ | | | | Full interview guide / survey instrument | | ✓ | ✓ if long | | Codebook (definitions + paraphrased exemplars) | | ✓ | ✓ | | Trace-pipeline ledger and attrition table | summary | ✓ | code as archive | | Analysis scripts | | | ✓ (archive) | | Additional tables/robustness checks | | ✓ | ✓ | | Consent forms / recruitment text | | | ✓ | | Raw transcripts, identifiable data | never | never | never | Decision rule: **anything a reviewer needs to evaluate a claim belongs in the paper or appendix; anything a reviewer needs to *trust* the method belongs in the supplement; anything participants did not consent to share belongs nowhere.** ## Anonym

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. What goes where
  2. Anonymization is deeper than the PDF
  3. R&R versioning discipline
  4. Pre-upload checklist
Commands it runs
strings that must not appear anywhere in the supplement tree
grep -ri -l -E "(surname|firstname|university-name|lab-name|grant-no|protocol-no)" supplement/
metadata in every PDF
for f in supplement/**/*.pdf; do exiftool "$f" | grep -iE "author|creator|company"; done
accidental git history or user paths in code archives
find supplement/ -name ".git" -o -path "*Users*" -o -path "*home*" | head
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the cscw-supplementary skill do?

Use when assembling supplementary materials for a CSCW submission — appendices, codebooks, interview guides, survey instruments, analysis code, and data extracts — deciding what accompanies a journal-model paper, anonymized end to end and consistent across R&R rounds.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going