cscw-review-process
Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# CSCW Review Process CSCW reviews papers the way a journal does, wearing a conference's name. Decisions come in revision vocabulary, revised papers return to the **same reviewers**, and — under the rolling model launched for CSCW 2027+ — the process is run by an **editorial board** (Editors-in-Chief Amy Bruckman and Eric Gilbert, with handling editors per methodological track) rather than a per-year program committee. Reading the process correctly changes how you write, revise, and wait. ## The decision ladder (2026-cycle vocabulary) | Decision | What it means | What it asks of you | | --- | --- | --- | | Revise for External Review | Screeners saw promise but flaws worth fixing *before* reviewers are spent on it | A focused repair on a short clock; treat as a free pre-review | | Revise and Resubmit (R&R) | The default serious outcome: reviewers want a substantially revised paper, which they will re-read | The full revision campaign (`cscw-author-response`) | | Conditional Accept with Minor Changes | The paper is in, pending verifiable edits | Execute precisely; do not renegotiate scope | | Accept | Done; production begins | `cscw-camera-ready` | | Reject | The venue is declining t
- The decision ladder (2026-cycle vocabulary)
- Same-reviewer re-review: the defining mechanic
- The rolling editorial board (CSCW 2027+)
- Waiting-time interpretation
- Standing-report format
What does the cscw-review-process skill do?
Use when interpreting where a CSCW paper stands in review — the PACMHCI journal model's decision vocabulary (Revise for External Review, Revise and Resubmit, Conditional Accept), same-reviewer re-review, the rolling editorial board, and what each outcome statistically implied in the last cycle.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cscw-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.