content-quality-auditor

What it does

Evaluates content quality across 80 standardized criteria organized in 8 dimensions. Produces a full audit report with per-item scores, dimension and system scores, weighted totals by content type, a veto detection mechanism, a top-5 improvement ranking, and an actionable improvement plan.

How it works

• Performs a full 80-item CORE-EEAT audit, scoring each item as Pass/Partial/Fail (mapped to 10/5/0 points respectively).
• Computes 8 dimension scores (0-100 each) and aggregate system scores (GEO Score and SEO Score).
• Applies content-type weights to generate weighted totals.
• Detects veto conditions (e.g., critical trust violations) and flags them for immediate attention.
• Ranks the top 5 improvements by impact and generates a concrete action plan.
• Reads the target content, content type, and supporting evidence; writes a user-facing audit report plus a reusable memory handoff. Stores veto items and publish blockers to memory/hot-cache and top improvements to memory/open-loops.

When to use it

Use when content needs a quality check before publishing or when asked for E-E-A-T analysis or publish readiness. Triggered especially after content is written or substantially edited, or for benchmarking against CORE-EEAT standards and competitor content.

What it can touch

The skill references tool usage for fetching and evaluating content and writing audit artifacts. It requires and interacts with tools and scripts listed in the skill, and produces outputs intended for memory storage (memory/audits/content/) and hot-cache updates.

Caveats

The audit follows the CORE-EEAT benchmark and uses a strict, deterministic scoring scheme with explicit veto handling and cap rules for veto scenarios. Output structure adheres to the Skill Contract formatting requirements, including frontmatter markers and handoff fields. If critical vetoes are triggered, the handoff notes cap_applied and final_overall_score per the rule set.