conflict-gwg-datenqualitaet-xai
Wenn es um Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck in Corporate-Kanzlei geht: zerlegt Ergebnis, Frist, Zuständigkeit, Beweislast und Gegenposition; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.
npx skills add Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht --skill conflict-gwg-datenqualitaet-xai --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
What it does
The skill is a structured workflow for performing a conflict, GwG (money laundering) and sanctions check in a corporate-law context. It guides the agent to clarify the role, target output, and deadlines; marks deadlines and urgent risks first using specific domain sections; verifies a set of core laws and sources live; identifies the responsible party and recipients; collects documents and evidence, flags gaps via a live-check for current norms; distinguishes corporate actors and documentation; sets a materiality threshold with an amber/green/red risk framework; performs norm checks across listed statutory groups; builds a chain of evidence linking statements to sources; constructs a risk matrix with recommended actions, owners, and deadlines; chooses a draft or review gate depending on sufficiency of facts; and prepares hand-off outputs (board papers, closing lists, etc.). It requires the agent to output in full sentences and to cite sources with explicit references. It uses a variety of outputs such as Corporate-Vermerk, Beschluss-/Board-Paper-Modul, Issue List, Information Request, and Matter-Update, and includes rigorous checks for reliability and source traceability. The skill relies on a CLAUDE-Code toolset for execution and references a matter workspace structure for context.
How it works
- Corporate-Kontext fixieren: establish the entity, form, role, purpose, decision recipient, and the current deadline; if missing, request one targeted question; proceed with a placeholder if under deadline pressure.
- Quellen inventarisieren: list documents with date, version, source, register/urkunden-ID, and confidentiality; tag uploads as [Mandant], registers as [Register], primary sources as [Primärquelle], and model knowledge as [Modellwissen - prüfen].
- Organ- und Kompetenzebene trennen; separate management/board from shareholders and other bodies.
- Materiality-Schwelle setzen: use a traffic-light approach (grün/gelb/rot) depending on gaps and risks.
- Normenprüfung durchführen: check responsibility, form, deadline, majority, power, registerability, liability, and evidence sources across defined norm groups.
- Belegkette bauen: each key assertion must have a source, document, location, and uncertainty marker; if source is unavailable mark [zu verifizieren].
- Risikomatrix erstellen: for each item include fact, legal question, norm, subsumption, risk light, consequence, recommended action, owner, deadline, and subsequent skill.
- Draft oder Review-Gate wählen: deliver output if facts suffice; otherwise provide an information-request list or a partner/organ template with open decisions.
- Hand-off vorbereiten: transfer findings into a draft decision document, board paper, register filing, SPA markup, CP-tracker, client email, or Closing Bible; reference the downstream skill.
- Abschlusskontrolle: ensure no unverified case numbers, no blind citations, no automatic external communications, and no confidential data outside the need-to-know circle.
When to use it
Triggered by statements like: "Ich habe hier Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck und brauche einen belastbaren nächsten Schritt."; queries about society, management, or in-house legal; creating a board draft, client email, or organizational document; or questions about missing register, decisions, or deadlines. It advises against starting when the corporate file is not yet established or mandate roles undefined; in such cases alternative skills are suggested.
What it can touch
- Tools: claude-code
- Context variables to be used include: gesellschaft, rolle, organ, beschlussdatum, registerstand, frist_oder_closing, materiality_threshold, owner, source_tag. It requires listing documents with date, version, source, and IDs, plus tagging sources such as [Mandant], [Register], [BGH-Datenbank], [dejure.org], [EUR-Lex], [Web-Recherche - prüfen], [Modellwissen - prüfen].
Caveats
- Output must be in full sentences; no speculative or unverifiable statements; no model-wisdom citations; must cite sources with explicit references.
- Do not replace or override Mandant decisions or organizational authorization; no automatic external communication.
- The skill maintains separation between corporate-finding, contractual risk, and economic assessment; no final tax, competition, sanctions or cross-border statements without specialist review.
- All data handling respects need-to-know and security constraints; mark sensitive data for clean-room or insider lists when appropriate.
# Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck ## Arbeitsweg - Rolle, Ziel und gewünschtes Arbeitsprodukt klären: Wer handelt, welche Entscheidung steht an, welche Frist läuft und welcher Output wird gebraucht? - Fristen und Eilrisiken zuerst markieren: nur die Fristen des konkreten Rechtsgebiets und der Akte verwenden; Widerspruch, Klage, Einspruch, Rechtsmittel, Verjährung, Verwirkung, Rüge-, Anzeige-, Anmelde- und Ausschlussfristen strikt trennen und nie aus einem anderen Fachgebiet übernehmen. - Tragende Normen verifizieren: BRAO, BORA, FAO, BNotO, StBerG, WPO, PAO; AO §§ 38, 42, 90, 93, 153, 162, 164, 169-171, 173, 233a, 370-378, UStG, EStG, KStG, GewStG, GrEStG, ErbStG, FGO; StaRUG — Fundstellen über gesetze-im-internet.de, dejure.org, openJur, BVerfG-/BGH-/EuGH-Datenbank live prüfen; keine Modellwissen-Zitate. - Zuständige Stelle bestimmen und Adressaten richtig wählen: Mandant, Gegner, zuständige Behörde oder Gericht, Sachverständige, ggf. EU-/internationale Stelle (siehe Skill-Detail). - Dokumente und Beweismittel sammeln und auf Lücken prüfen: Verwaltungsakte, Vertragsurkunden, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Sachverständigengutachten und externe Beweismittel des Fachgebiets —
- Arbeitsweg
- Fachlicher Kern — Gesellschaftsrecht und Corporate Law
- Fachkern: Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck
- Wann wird dieser Skill aufgerufen
- Voraussetzungen und Kontext laden
- Workflow
- Pruefraster im Gutachtenstil
- Output-Module
- Quellen und Zitierregel
- Hand-Off zu anderen Skills
- Was dieser Arbeitsgang nicht macht
- Berufsrechtliche Hinweise
- Bisheriger Skill-Kern, integriert und weiterzuverwenden
- Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck
What does the conflict-gwg-datenqualitaet-xai skill do?
Wenn es um Konflikt-, GwG- und Sanktionscheck in Corporate-Kanzlei geht: zerlegt Ergebnis, Frist, Zuständigkeit, Beweislast und Gegenposition; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht --skill conflict-gwg-datenqualitaet-xai --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht, a repository with 1,422 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.
