Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

conext-submission

Use when auditing an ACM CoNEXT submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the choice between the December and June cycles, the mandatory paper-registration step, the ACM acmart page budget (long ≤16 + ≤4 appendix; short ≤10 + ≤2 appendix), double-anonymous review, the reproducibility badge opt-in due at submission, PACMNET publication, and desk-reject triage before the cutoff.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conext-submission --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: CoNEXT-Skills/skills/conext-submission/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# CoNEXT Submission Run this audit before uploading to the CoNEXT HotCRP site. CoNEXT research papers are published as **journal articles in PACMNET** (Proceedings of the ACM on Networking), so the submission is judged like a journal manuscript that also earns a conference slot. Every number below was read from the CoNEXT 2026 call and the CoNEXT 2025 CFP on 2026-07-09 via search renderings (see [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md)); treat them as a one-cycle snapshot and reopen the live call first. ## Pick the cycle first CoNEXT runs **two submission cycles a year**, and choosing the wrong one costs months: - The **December cycle** (for CoNEXT 2026: registration 5 Dec 2025, submission 12 Dec 2025) gives an earlier notification (31 Mar 2026) and, if you earn a major revision, a spring resubmission path. - The **June cycle** (submission 5 Jun 2026) is the later entry point into the *same* annual program and the same rolling PACMNET volume. Both feed one conference and one journal volume, so the decision is about *readiness and calendar*, not prestige — submit to the nearer honest deadline your evidence is actually ready for. See [`conext

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Pick the cycle first
  2. The two-step deadline within a cycle
  3. Format and page budget
  4. Double-anonymous sweep
  5. Reproducibility opt-in at submission time
  6. Desk-risk triage
  7. Final-week order of operations
  8. Reverify each cycle
  9. Output format
Commands it runs
Mechanical pass on the submission PDF and any anonymized artifact archive
pdfinfo paper.pdf | grep -Ei 'author|creator|producer'
pdftotext paper.pdf - | grep -nEi 'github\.com/[a-z0-9-]+|gitlab|zenodo\.org/record|acknowledg|grant|our (testbed|deployment|university)' | head
unzip -l artifact.zip | grep -Ei '\.git/|\.DS_Store|/home/|/Users/' | head
grep -rniE 'university|@[a-z0-9.]+\.edu|internal hostname|AS[0-9]+ .*our' artifact/ --include='*.md' | head
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the conext-submission skill do?

Use when auditing an ACM CoNEXT submission for HotCRP readiness, covering the choice between the December and June cycles, the mandatory paper-registration step, the ACM acmart page budget (long ≤16 + ≤4 appendix; short ≤10 + ≤2 appendix), double-anonymous review, the reproducibility badge opt-in due at submission, PACMNET publication, and desk-reject triage before the cutoff.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conext-submission --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going