Agent skill · Data & Analytics

cikm-writing-style

Use when revising a CIKM manuscript for the tri-community readership — writing an opening that lands with IR, data-mining, and knowledge-management reviewers simultaneously, compressing into appendix-inclusive page budgets, keeping claims inside the evidence, and maintaining double-blind and disclosure-compliant prose.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: CIKM-Skills/skills/cikm-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# CIKM Writing Style A CIKM paper is read in three accents at once. The IR reviewer scans for the task and the evaluation; the mining reviewer scans for the mechanism and its delta; the KM/database reviewer scans for the data reality — schemas, scale, heterogeneity, noise. Style at this venue means making all three scans succeed in the first page, inside a budget where appendices offer no escape (10 pages including them for 2026 full papers). ## The first page, three scans deep Order the opening so each lane hits its anchor early: 1. **The information problem** in domain terms — what is being retrieved, mined, linked, or integrated, and for whom. 2. **Why the boundary is the hard part.** CIKM contributions usually live where lanes meet; say which interaction breaks existing single-lane methods ("KG completion models assume static graphs; enterprise search feeds them a stream"). 3. **The mechanism, named.** One clause a mining reviewer can repeat in their review. 4. **The evidence preview, calibrated.** Datasets, baselines, and the honest size of the win — with the deployment or resource evidence up front if the track demands it. If the paper cannot state point 2, it is a single-lan

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The first page, three scans deep
  2. Vocabulary discipline across lanes
  3. Budget compression, appendix-inclusive
  4. Anonymity and disclosure in prose
  5. Section skeleton for a 10-page full paper
  6. Title and abstract as routing devices
  7. Micro-rewrite exercise
  8. Limitations without self-sabotage
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the cikm-writing-style skill do?

Use when revising a CIKM manuscript for the tri-community readership — writing an opening that lands with IR, data-mining, and knowledge-management reviewers simultaneously, compressing into appendix-inclusive page budgets, keeping claims inside the evidence, and maintaining double-blind and disclosure-compliant prose.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cikm-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going