Agent skill · Data & Analytics

cie-rebuttal

Use when responding to external-review / R&R comments for 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics). Builds a point-by-point response letter that prioritizes identification and the robustness arms race, revises the manuscript first, and supplies the data/code the journal requires. Do not generate the letter before the text is revised.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cie-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: China-Industrial-Economics-Skills/skills/cie-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 外审回复 / R&R(cie-rebuttal) ## 触发时机 - 收到《中国工业经济》匿名外审意见 / 退修通知 - 需要逐条回复并据此修订正文 ## 前置铁律 **先改正文,再写回复。** 回复信是对已完成修订的索引,不是承诺清单。本刊双向匿名、审理期长,审稿人通常专业且要求高——回复要"做了什么 + 改在哪页",而非"我们会考虑"。 ## 本刊审稿意见的高频集中区(按优先级回应) 1. **识别**:平行趋势是否成立、交错处理偏误、安慰剂、聚类层级、预期效应——**最常见、最致命** 2. **稳健性**:"请再补 X 检验 / 排除 Y 解释"——按 `cie-robustness` 四大块补满 3. **机制**:质疑三步中介 → 改分渠道/调节(援引江艇 2022) 4. **异质性**:要求更多维度或组间差异检验 5. **经济含义**:要求报量级、避免"两张皮" 6. **政策建议**:要求更可操作 7. **数据与可复现**:补交原始数据 + 处理过程 + 程序代码 ## 回复信结构(逐条) 每条意见用统一三段式: ``` 【意见 N】(原文摘要) 【回应】我们接受/部分接受/谨慎商榷,理由:…… 【修改】已在第 X 页 / 表 Y / 图 Z 做了……(具体到位置与新增结果) ``` - 接受:直接改,指明位置 - 部分接受:说明采纳哪部分、为何另一部分不宜 - 商榷:**有礼有据**,用文献/数据反驳,不硬顶;必要时补稳健性以化解担忧 - 新增的检验/图表在回复信中**贴出关键结果**,方便审稿人核对 ## 修订配套 - [ ] 正文已据意见实际修改(不是只在回复信里说) - [ ] 新增识别/稳健性检验已进正文或附录 - [ ] 准备好更新后的**数据与程序代码** - [ ] 修订稿做好匿名(见 `cie-submission`) ## 自检清单 - [ ] 每条意见都有回应 + 定位到页/表/图 - [ ] 识别类意见优先且充分回应 - [ ] 机制若被质疑三步中介,已改分渠道/调节并说明 - [ ] 商榷之处有文献/数据支撑,语气专业克制 - [ ] 关键新增结果在信中可见 - [ ] 正文确已修订(非空头承诺) ## 反模式 - 正文没改,回复信先写"我们已充分考虑" - 对识别质疑避重就轻、用文字搪塞 - 硬顶审稿人 / 情绪化 - 承诺补检验却未真正补 - 漏回某条意见 ## 本刊外审意见分诊表(按优先级排雷) | 意见类型 | 致命度 | 标准修法 / 配套 skill | |----------|--------|----------------------| | 平行趋势/交错偏误/安慰剂 | 高 | 事件研究图+CS/SA+安慰剂 → `cie-did-identification` | | 排除竞争性解释

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 前置铁律
  3. 本刊审稿意见的高频集中区(按优先级回应)
  4. 回复信结构(逐条)
  5. 修订配套
  6. 自检清单
  7. 反模式
  8. 本刊外审意见分诊表(按优先级排雷)
  9. 微型走查:一封三条意见的回复信骨架
  10. 审稿人追问 × 本刊语境修法
  11. 校准锚点
  12. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the cie-rebuttal skill do?

Use when responding to external-review / R&R comments for 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics). Builds a point-by-point response letter that prioritizes identification and the robustness arms race, revises the manuscript first, and supplies the data/code the journal requires. Do not generate the letter before the text is revised.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cie-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going