Agent skill · Testing & QA

cie-literature-review

Use when the literature section of a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript is a citation pile instead of a critical review that locates the gap. Enforces gap-driven 文献述评 (not 罗列), recent-five-year frontier coverage, and a clean separation between literature review and theory analysis.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cie-literature-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 2 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: China-Industrial-Economics-Skills/skills/cie-literature-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 文献述评(cie-literature-review) ## 触发时机 - 综述写成"A 发现…,B 发现…,C 发现…"的罗列 - 没有述评不足、看不出本文进入的缺口 - 文献综述与理论分析混在一起 - 缺近五年前沿文献 ## 本刊对文献的要求(投稿指南原文要点) - **围绕选题做文献述评**,重点**梳理现有研究的不足之处**,体现前沿性 - 须包含**近五年**相关文献,有理论性、系统性,**拒绝罗列式综述** - 引言与文献综述**可合并**;一般性综述并入前言与讨论部分,**方法类文献并入实证检验部分** - 杜绝把文献综述和理论分析相混淆 ## 述评结构(建议) 1. **现状**:该问题已有研究分几条线索(按机制/口径/方法分类,不按时间流水) 2. **不足**:每条线索"做到哪、缺什么"——这是缺口 3. **定位**:本文从哪个缺口切入,对应边际贡献 ## 引用纪律 - 引**高质量前沿学术论文与著作**,不引新闻报道、网站资讯等非学术文献(投稿指南明确) - 中英文献并重:相关国际前沿 + 中国本土经典与最新成果 - "实引"制度预备:文中引用的每一篇都要进文后参考文献,一一对应(见 `cie-submission`) ## 自检清单 - [ ] 综述是**述评**(有评价、有不足),不是罗列 - [ ] 按线索/机制分类组织,而非按年份流水账 - [ ] 含近五年前沿文献 - [ ] 每条不足都对应本文一条边际贡献 - [ ] 文献综述与理论分析分开,方法文献归入实证部分 - [ ] 无新闻/网站等非学术引用 ## 反模式 - "(A,2020;B,2021;C,2022)"式堆砌 - 综述很全但看不出本文缺口在哪 - 把国外理论模型当综述照搬 - 用政策文件、新闻替代学术文献 ## 本刊文献审稿期待与退稿模式 | 审稿期待(投稿指南口径) | 达标证据 | 退稿/退修模式 | |--------------------------|----------|----------------| | 述评而非罗列 | 按线索分类 + 指出每条线索的不足 | "A 发现…B 发现…"流水账 | | 体现前沿性 | 含近五年中英文前沿成果 | 文献停在三五年前、缺国际前沿 | | 缺口对应贡献 | 每条不足映射本文一条边际贡献 | 综述很全但看不出本文进入点 | | 引用纪律 | 仅引高质量学术文献 | 用新闻、政策文件、网站充数 | | 述评与理论分开 | 文献述评归综述、机制推演归理论 | 把文献综述当理论分析写 | > 罗列式综述、缺口不清是本刊文献部分的典型退修点;具体口径以编辑部最新《投稿(修改)指南》为准。 ## 微型走查:智能制造试点 × TFP 的文献述评 围绕"智能制造/数字化政策对企业生产率"组织三条线索,每条收口到"

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 本刊对文献的要求(投稿指南原文要点)
  3. 述评结构(建议)
  4. 引用纪律
  5. 自检清单
  6. 反模式
  7. 本刊文献审稿期待与退稿模式
  8. 微型走查:智能制造试点 × TFP 的文献述评
  9. 审稿人追问 × 本刊语境修法
  10. 校准锚点
  11. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the cie-literature-review skill do?

Use when the literature section of a 《中国工业经济》 (China Industrial Economics) manuscript is a citation pile instead of a critical review that locates the gap. Enforces gap-driven 文献述评 (not 罗列), recent-five-year frontier coverage, and a clean separation between literature review and theory analysis.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cie-literature-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going