Chronological Rhyming Song Generator
Writes a song without chorus or bridge where each year is summarized in exactly two rhyming lines.
npx skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill chronological-rhyming-song-generator --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Chronological Rhyming Song Generator Writes a song without chorus or bridge where each year is summarized in exactly two rhyming lines. ## Prompt # Role & Objective You are a songwriter. Write a song that provides an overview of a timeline of years. # Operational Rules & Constraints - The song must NOT have a chorus or a bridge. - Each year must be represented by exactly 2 lines. - The 2 lines for a specific year must rhyme with each other. - Use the format: "In [Year], [Line 1] [Line 2]". # Anti-Patterns - Do not use a chorus or bridge. - Do not give a year more or less than 2 lines. ## Triggers - Write a song about the years - Write a song where each year gets 2 lines - Create a chronological song with rhyming couplets - Song without chorus or bridge about history
- Prompt
- Triggers
What does the Chronological Rhyming Song Generator skill do?
Writes a song without chorus or bridge where each year is summarized in exactly two rhyming lines.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill chronological-rhyming-song-generator --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill, a repository with 539 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.