Agent skill · Documentation

chi-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: CHI-Skills/skills/chi-writing-style/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# CHI Writing Style A CHI paper is read by a jury that rarely shares one methodological culture: a quantitative experimenter, a design researcher, and an ethnographer may all review the same submission. The prose must therefore do explicit work that a single-culture venue lets authors skip — naming the contribution type, justifying the method choice to outsiders, and calibrating claims to human evidence. And because CHI reviews length against contribution ("papers should be commensurate with their contribution"; 5,000–8,000 words encouraged, per the CHI 2027 Papers page, read 2026-07-08), every paragraph is auditable: does this paragraph earn its words? ## The contribution statement is load-bearing CHI convention puts an explicit contribution list at the end of the introduction. Write it first, keep it honest, and let it govern the paper: ```text This paper contributes: (1) <empirical finding>: the first interview study (n=24) of <population> doing <activity>, showing <the finding in one clause>; (2) <artifact>: <system>, an open-source <what>, which embodies <the design claim>; (3) <design implications>: five implications for <who>, grounded in (1) and tested against (2). ``` Each

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The contribution statement is load-bearing
  2. Section-by-section: what each reviewer culture checks
  3. Participant voice without ventriloquism
  4. Calibration is the house register
  5. Write for the ear and the screen reader
  6. Length discipline in a no-page-limit venue
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the chi-writing-style skill do?

Use when drafting or revising the prose of an ACM CHI paper — contribution statements, structure for mixed reviewer audiences, participant voice, calibrated claims, accessible and bias-free writing, and length discipline in a venue that reviews words against contribution instead of pages.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-writing-style --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going