chi-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging the artifacts behind an ACM CHI paper — prototypes, study instruments, codebooks, datasets, analysis code — for anonymous review scrutiny and for post-acceptance archival release, in a venue with no formal artifact-evaluation committee doing it for you.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# CHI Artifact Evaluation CHI's Papers track posted no separate artifact-evaluation committee or badge track for the cycles checked (2026, 2027; confirm each year — 待核实 as a standing item). That absence cuts both ways: nobody certifies your artifacts, and nobody but you ensures a skeptical reviewer can inspect them. At CHI the "artifact" is rarely just code — it is the prototype, the study instruments, the codebook, the dataset, and the video evidence of the system working. Package for two audiences with opposite needs: the anonymous reviewer with five minutes, and the future researcher with a real use for your materials. ## The CHI artifact inventory | Artifact | Reviewer's question | Archival value after acceptance | |---|---|---| | Prototype / system code | "Does the claimed interaction actually exist?" | Others extend or compare against it | | Video figure of real use | "Does it work outside the authors' hands?" | Permanent DL evidence (`chi-supplementary`) | | Study instruments (guides, questionnaires, tasks) | "Was the study what the paper says?" | Direct reuse in replications | | Codebook / analysis audit trail | "Do the themes live in the data?" | Methods teaching material
- The CHI artifact inventory
- Reviewer-facing packaging (anonymous, five minutes)
- Post-acceptance release is a separate product
- Honest holes beat cosmetic completeness
- Timing inside the CHI year
- Output format
Cold-simulate the reviewer on the exact ZIP you will upload rm -rf /tmp/ae && unzip -q supplement.zip -d /tmp/ae && cd /tmp/ae cat README* | head -30 # does the claims map appear immediately? grep -rEil 'author|university|(^|[^a-z])lab' --include='*.md' . | head time bash run_minimal_demo.sh # the five-minute budget is literal
What does the chi-artifact-evaluation skill do?
Use when packaging the artifacts behind an ACM CHI paper — prototypes, study instruments, codebooks, datasets, analysis code — for anonymous review scrutiny and for post-acceptance archival release, in a venue with no formal artifact-evaluation committee doing it for you.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill chi-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.