ceq-abstract-english
Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ceq-abstract-english --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# 英文摘要与贡献陈述（ceq-abstract-english） ## 触发时机 - 英文摘要质量差 / 中式英语 / 超长 - 贡献写成"This paper enriches the literature on…" - 定稿前，主结果与识别已确定 ## 为什么重要 CEQ 很多读者**只读英文摘要 + 图**（见 `ceq-figures`）。英文摘要 = 你的门面。它必须让 field 经济学家在 100 词内看懂：**问什么、怎么识别、发现什么、相对谁是新的**。CEQ 规范：英文摘要不超过约 100 个单词，三个中英文关键词，三个 JEL 号（详见 `resources/journal-profile.md`）。 ## 五句法（控制在 ~100 词） 1. **问题**：研究的因果问题（一句，去本土包装）。 2. **设计**：识别来源（"Using the staggered rollout of …, we …"）。 3. **发现**：量化主结果 + 单位（"… raises Y by X%"）。 4. **机制**：一句话渠道。 5. **贡献/含义**：相对最近文献的差异，或一句政策/理论含义。 ## 好坏对照 | 黑名单（中式/空话） | 白名单（field 可读） | |---------------------|----------------------| | "This paper enriches the literature." | "We provide the first credibly identified estimate of …" | | "We use a series of robust methods." | "Using a regression discontinuity at the eligibility cutoff …" | | "The results have important policy implications." | "A 10% increase in X reduces Y by 4%, implying …" | | "Our study fills a gap in domestic research." | "Unlike Author (Year), who rely on OLS, we exploit …" | ## 英文写作规范 - 主动语态、现在时陈述发现；避免冗长从句。 - 量化结果带单位与符号方向，别只说"significant"。 - 术语用 field 标准词（identification, parallel trends, instrument），不要直译中文。 - 不堆方法名词；识别策略一句带过即可。 - 中英文摘要表意一致，但英文不必逐句直译中
- 触发时机
- 为什么重要
- 五句法（控制在 ~100 词）
- 好坏对照
- 英文写作规范
- 自检清单
- 反模式
- CEQ 英文摘要的诊断—修法表
- 微型走查：把中式直译改成 field 摘要
- 审稿人会怎么挑英文摘要
- 输出格式
What does the ceq-abstract-english skill do?
Use when writing or polishing the English abstract and contribution statement for a 《经济学(季刊)》 (China Economic Quarterly, CEQ) manuscript — producing a tight English abstract (≤ ~100 words per the journal's guideline) that reads to a field economist and benchmarks the contribution against specific papers. Use at the polish stage, after identification and results are final.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ceq-abstract-english --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.